Sure Leverage Funding vs QT Funded: 2026 Prop Firm Rules & Pricing Compared

🏆 QT Funded Wins on Trust Volume & Price

Sure Leverage Funding
4.1
★ 1,700+ reviews
VS

QT Funded
4.4
★ 12,354 reviews

QT Funded and Sure Leverage Funding both launched within months of each other in 2023, and both compete aggressively on price at the low end of the account-size spectrum. QT Funded has scaled its Trustpilot presence to more than 12,000 reviews at a 4.4-star average — one of the largest verified review bases of any mid-tier prop firm — while offering an entry-level challenge for as little as $10.40. Sure Leverage Funding counters with its own near-free promotional entry and a static 8% drawdown option that gives risk-averse traders a fixed floor instead of QT Funded’s trailing-drawdown structure on standard programs. Both firms report real payout volume ($16M+ for QT Funded, undisclosed exact figures for Sure Leverage Funding), and both have documented rule-interpretation disputes worth reading before funding a larger account.

The problem: QT Funded’s review volume is genuinely impressive, but a closer read of Prop Firm Match’s trader-submitted complaints shows a recurring theme: disputed drawdown-breach calculations, where traders say the firm’s reported real-time equity figures don’t match their own trade logs and pre-set stop-loss levels. QT Funded’s platform side also isn’t separately regulated — only the affiliated brokerage entity holds an FSCA license — which matters if a dispute ever needs third-party resolution. Sure Leverage Funding traders run into the familiar pattern from this comparison set: a 24-hour payout promise that sounds strong, undercut by soft-breach profit deductions applied at review time and public funding-cap figures that don’t fully agree across the firm’s own help-center pages. Both firms’ consistency rules — QT’s 25-35% single-day profit cap, Sure Leverage Funding’s roughly comparable structure — mean a single strong trading day can actually work against you at payout time if it accounts for too large a share of total profit, a mechanic new traders on either platform often don’t discover until their first withdrawal request.

At a glance

Quick Comparison

Sure Leverage Funding QT Funded
Starting Price $5 per promo 2-Step $5K challenge activation (standard fees scale with account size up to $200K) $10.40 per QT Power challenge (lowest tier); scales up with account size and program
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.4 / 5
Free Trial No (Free Challenge promo requires $1-5 activation fee, not a true free trial) No free trial
Best For Traders who want a fixed 8% static drawdown option instead of QT Funded’s trailing-drawdown structure Traders who want the industry’s largest verified Trustpilot review base at an ultra-low entry price
Ease of Use 4.2 / 10 4.3 / 10
Support Rating 3.8 / 10 4.0 / 10
Mobile App Via third-party MT5/Match-Trader mobile apps (no dedicated SLF app) Via third-party MT5/cTrader/TradeLocker mobile apps (no dedicated QT Funded app)
Start Sure Leverage Funding Challenge → Compare QT Funded Challenge Tiers →

Pros & Cons

Sure Leverage Funding
Pros
  • Static drawdown option (8%) available on the Instant Standard account, giving a fixed rather than trailing risk floor
  • EA Challenge account permits algorithmic trading during evaluation
  • Promotional Free Challenge converts a $1-5 activation fee into a $5,000 2-Step account
  • 24-hour payout promise with a 10% profit-split bonus if the firm misses the window
Cons
  • Trustpilot review base (~1,700) is a fraction of QT Funded’s more than 12,000 tracked reviews
  • Public funding-cap figures conflict across help-center pages ($200,000 vs $400,000)
  • EA usage ends once an account converts from evaluation to funded
QT Funded
Pros
  • 12,354+ Trustpilot reviews at a 4.4/5 average, by far the largest independently verified review base in this comparison set
  • Ultra-low entry pricing, with QT Power starting at just $10.40, among the cheapest challenge fees industry-wide
  • $16M+ paid out to over 105,000 traders across 180 countries, per the firm’s own reporting reviewed by FXEmpire
  • Four distinct evaluation paths (QT Instant, QT Power, QT Prime, QT Ultra) with profit splits ranging from 80% up to 100% on QT Prime On-Demand
Cons
  • A 25% consistency rule on QT Instant and 35% on QT Power restrict how much of total profit can come from a single trading day
  • The prop trading platform itself is not separately regulated; only the brokerage side (Quant Tekel Pty Ltd) holds an FSCA license
  • Some Trustpilot and Prop Firm Match reviews describe disputed drawdown-breach calculations, including cases where traders challenged the firm’s real-time equity figures against their own trade logs

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Feature Sure Leverage Funding QT Funded Winner
Trustpilot Rating 4.1/5 (~1,700 reviews) 4.4/5 (12,354 reviews) QT Funded
Cheapest Entry Price $5 (promo activation fee) $10.40 (QT Power) Sure Leverage Funding
Drawdown Model Static 8% option on Instant Standard Primarily trailing drawdown (3-8% depending on program) Sure Leverage Funding
Max Profit Split Up to 100% (top-tier performers) Up to 100% (QT Prime On-Demand only) Tie
Total Verified Payouts Undisclosed exact figure $16,000,000+ across 105,000+ traders QT Funded
Integrations MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker; payouts via Rise and USDT (TRC20) MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker; payouts bi-weekly via bank transfer or cryptocurrency

Final Verdict

🏆
Winner: QT Funded
QT Funded’s sheer review volume — over 12,000 tracked Trustpilot reviews versus Sure Leverage Funding’s roughly 1,700 — gives it a statistical trust advantage that’s hard to overstate in an industry where firms disappear overnight. Combined with a documented $16M+ payout history across 105,000+ traders and one of the lowest entry price points industry-wide, QT Funded earns the edge here for traders who prioritize a verifiable track record above all else. That said, the drawdown-breach disputes surfacing in Prop Firm Match reviews are a real concern worth weighing, particularly since the prop platform itself sits outside QT Funded’s brokerage-side FSCA license. Sure Leverage Funding’s static 8% drawdown option on its Instant Standard account is a genuine structural advantage for traders who specifically want a fixed rather than trailing risk floor, something QT Funded’s primarily trailing-drawdown model doesn’t match on most programs. Our recommendation: traders who weight review-volume and payout-history trust signals heavily should default to QT Funded, especially at its ultra-low $10.40 entry point. Traders who specifically need a static drawdown structure, or who want the EA Challenge’s evaluation-phase bot access, should weigh Sure Leverage Funding’s narrower but still real feature set against QT Funded’s much deeper trust record before deciding.
Choose Sure Leverage Funding if:a fixed static drawdown floor and evaluation-phase EA access matter more to you than review-volume trust signals
Choose QT Funded if:you want the largest verified review base, the lowest entry price, and a documented eight-figure payout history

Frequently Asked Questions

How large is QT Funded’s Trustpilot review base compared to Sure Leverage Funding’s?

QT Funded’s Trustpilot profile shows more than 12,354 reviews at a 4.4/5 average as of the most recent tracked snapshot, according to BestPropFirmGuide and ThePropFirmGuide’s 2026 data. Sure Leverage Funding’s review base is considerably smaller, at roughly 1,700+ reviews and a 4.1/5 average, reflecting its shorter operating history since its November 2023 founding versus QT Funded’s October 2023 launch.

What are QT Funded’s consistency rules?

QT Funded applies a consistency rule that varies by program: 25% on QT Instant and 35% on QT Power, meaning no single trading day can account for more than that percentage of total realized profit at payout time. This is a common industry mechanic designed to discourage traders from passing an evaluation on one lucky trade, but it can genuinely limit payouts for traders who catch one exceptionally strong day.

Is QT Funded regulated?

Partially. QT Funded’s affiliated brokerage entity, Quant Tekel Pty Ltd, holds a license with the FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) in South Africa, but the prop trading platform side of the business is not separately regulated as its own entity, according to FXEmpire’s 2026 review. This distinction matters because regulatory oversight of the broker doesn’t automatically extend to the challenge and funded-account structure itself.

Does Sure Leverage Funding offer a static drawdown option?

Yes, on its Instant Standard account, Sure Leverage Funding offers an 8% static maximum drawdown that does not trail your account’s highest equity point, according to FundedTrading’s review of the firm’s rules. This differs from QT Funded’s primarily trailing-drawdown model on most standard programs, which recalculates the drawdown floor as your equity rises.

How much has QT Funded paid out to traders?

QT Funded reports more than $16 million paid out to over 105,000 traders across 180 countries, a figure reviewed by FXEmpire in its 2026 assessment of the firm. Some sources cite a slightly different figure ($14M+) depending on the reporting date, reflecting the firm’s continued growth since its October 2023 founding.

Last verified: 2026-08-12 · software_a facts held identical across all rows per the Anti-Duplication Protocol. software_b (QT Funded) rating and review count (4.4/5, 12,354 reviews) reflect ThePropFirmGuide’s 2026 snapshot; other sources in our research showed a wide range (3.9-4.5 rating, 600-12,832 reviews) depending on crawl date and platform, reflecting the firm’s very fast review-volume growth through 2026 – we used the most detailed, recently dated figure. software_b’s total payout figure ($16M+) is drawn from FXEmpire’s review citing the firm’s own reporting; this was not independently audited by a third party beyond the review platforms’ own aggregation, which is disclosed here per the Unverifiable Data Protocol. This page discloses that some outbound links may be affiliate links.

Leave a Comment