Sure Leverage Funding and FunderPro both launched in 2023 and both court traders who want more permissive rule sets than legacy firms like FTMO allow. FunderPro’s pitch is broader on-paper flexibility — EAs, bots and news trading explicitly allowed on funded accounts, no trailing drawdown, and a challenge fee refunded on first payout. Sure Leverage Funding counters with a larger total funding cap ($400,000 vs. FunderPro’s $200,000 base) and a more explicit payout SLA. Both firms carry real Trustpilot friction in 2026: FunderPro’s 1-star share has been climbing for over a year, and Sure Leverage Funding’s own help-center documentation has publicly conflicting funding-cap figures. Choosing between them depends heavily on whether you need EA access on a live funded account, not just during evaluation.
The problem: FunderPro’s biggest selling point — full EA and bot access on funded accounts — comes with a serious asterisk once you dig into TheTrustedProp’s 2026 investigation: the firm uses a ‘proprietary detection’ system to flag rule violations without sharing the specific evidence behind a breach decision, an information asymmetry the review says ‘inherently favors the firm in any dispute.’ That same review documents a rising 1-star trend accelerating since December 2025, with the negative share climbing from roughly 25% to 30% of all reviews over the past year. Sure Leverage Funding traders face a more familiar version of the same underlying problem: soft-breach profit deductions applied at payout review, and a funding-cap figure that changes depending on which help-center page you read. Both firms also share opaque scaling-plan documentation — FunderPro’s $1M-$5M tier criteria aren’t published with a specific formula, and Sure Leverage Funding’s own total-cap conflict raises the same ‘trust the fine print’ concern. The pattern across both firms is consistent: the headline flexibility is real, but the enforcement mechanism behind it deserves more scrutiny than either firm’s marketing page invites.
Quick Comparison
| Sure Leverage Funding | FunderPro | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $5 per promo 2-Step $5K challenge activation (standard fees scale with account size up to $200K) | $79 per one-time evaluation fee (Regular, Swing and Fast Track programs, $5,000-$200,000 accounts) |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Free Trial | No (Free Challenge promo requires $1-5 activation fee, not a true free trial) | No free trial; initial challenge fee is refunded with the first funded payout |
| Best For | Traders who want a larger $400,000 total funding cap and a structured, if evaluation-only, EA option | Traders who want full EA, bot and news-trading freedom with no trailing drawdown on funded accounts |
| Ease of Use | 4.2 / 10 | 4.0 / 10 |
| Support Rating | 3.8 / 10 | 3.7 / 10 |
| Mobile App | Via third-party MT5/Match-Trader mobile apps (no dedicated SLF app) | Via third-party TradeLocker/cTrader mobile apps, with TradingView integration |
| Start Sure Leverage Funding Challenge → | Review FunderPro’s Program Options → |
Pros & Cons
- Total funding cap of $400,000 across accounts, double FunderPro’s $200,000 base allocation
- 24-hour payout promise with a 10% profit-split bonus if the firm misses the window, a clearer SLA than FunderPro publishes
- Promotional Free Challenge converts a $1-5 activation fee into a $5,000 2-Step account
- Static 8% drawdown option available on the Instant Standard account
- EA usage is restricted to the evaluation phase only, versus FunderPro’s full bots-and-EAs-allowed policy on funded accounts
- Public funding-cap figures conflict across help-center pages ($200,000 vs $400,000)
- Mandatory stop-loss placement within five minutes of trade entry adds friction versus FunderPro’s more permissive rule set
- EAs, bots, and news trading are all explicitly allowed on funded accounts, with no restriction to the evaluation phase alone
- No trailing drawdown on funded accounts, and no maximum time limit for completing evaluation challenges
- Scaling potential up to $5 million, well above FunderPro’s $200,000 starting allocation
- Challenge fee is refunded with the trader’s first funded-account payout, reducing net entry cost for successful traders
- 1-star Trustpilot review share has been climbing, growing from roughly 25% to 30% over the past year according to TheTrustedProp’s 2026 audit, with an accelerating negative trend starting in December 2025
- FunderPro’s ‘proprietary detection’ system for flagging rule violations doesn’t share specific evidence with traders, creating an information asymmetry in disputes that TheTrustedProp’s review calls out directly
- Ratings vary sharply by platform, from 3.9/5 on Trustpilot (800 reviews) down to 3.3/5 on Google (26 reviews), a wider spread than most competitors in this comparison
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
| Feature | Sure Leverage Funding | FunderPro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Total Funding | $400,000 across accounts | $200,000 base (scaling to $5,000,000) | Tie |
| EA / Bot Policy on Funded Accounts | Not allowed (evaluation phase only) | Fully allowed, including news trading | FunderPro |
| Trustpilot Rating | 4.1/5 (~1,700 reviews) | 3.9/5 (800+ reviews) | Sure Leverage Funding |
| Payout SLA | 24-hour promise + 10% split bonus if missed | 24-48 hour processing, no published penalty guarantee | Sure Leverage Funding |
| Drawdown Model | Static 8% option on Instant Standard | No trailing drawdown on funded accounts | Tie |
| Integrations | MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker; payouts via Rise and USDT (TRC20) | TradeLocker, cTrader; payouts via Rise partnership, processed within 24-48 hours | — |
Final Verdict
Winner: Depends on EA Priority
Frequently Asked Questions
Does FunderPro allow EA and bot trading on funded accounts?
Yes. Unlike Sure Leverage Funding, which restricts algorithmic trading to its EA Challenge’s evaluation phase only, FunderPro explicitly permits EAs, bots and news trading on live funded accounts, according to FundedPerks’ 2026 review of the firm’s rules. This makes FunderPro the more viable option for traders who need continuous automated execution rather than just an evaluation-phase workaround.
What is FunderPro’s ‘proprietary detection’ system, and why is it controversial?
FunderPro uses an internal system to flag potential rule violations on trader accounts, but according to TheTrustedProp’s 2026 investigation, the firm states that specific detection data cannot be shared with traders ‘to protect proprietary processes.’ This creates a dispute structure where FunderPro can claim a violation occurred without providing verifiable evidence, which the review flags as inherently favoring the firm in any disagreement.
Is FunderPro’s Trustpilot rating trending up or down?
Down, based on TheTrustedProp’s tracked data through 2026: the share of 1-star reviews grew from roughly 25% to 30% over the past year, with an accelerating negative trend beginning in December 2025. Ratings also vary significantly by platform, from 3.9/5 on Trustpilot (800 reviews) to as low as 3.3/5 on Google (26 reviews), a wider cross-platform spread than most firms in this comparison set.
What is FunderPro’s maximum scaling potential?
FunderPro’s scaling plan can grow a funded account up to $5,000,000 from a $200,000 starting allocation, according to FundedPerks’ 2026 review, though the specific tier criteria and growth multiplier formula are not fully published. Sure Leverage Funding’s total funding cap is $400,000 across all accounts, considerably lower than FunderPro’s advertised ceiling but with fewer scaling-plan ambiguities on record.
Does FunderPro refund its challenge fee?
Yes, according to multiple reviews including FundYourTrade’s 2026 coverage, FunderPro’s initial challenge fee is refunded once a trader receives their first payout from a funded account. This is a similar trader-friendly structure to what several other firms in this comparison set offer, though the exact refund timing should be confirmed directly with FunderPro support before purchasing.