Sure Leverage Funding vs FXIFY: Which Instant Funding Prop Firm Wins in 2026?

🏆 FXIFY Wins on Trust & Scale

Sure Leverage Funding
4.1
★ 1,700+ reviews
VS

FXIFY
4.3
★ 6,146 reviews

Instant-funding and HFT-tolerant prop firms have become the fastest-growing corner of the funded-trader market, and Sure Leverage Funding and FXIFY are two of the names traders search side by side most often. Both firms launched around the same period (2023), both court algorithmic and high-frequency traders that stricter firms like FTMO or The5ers turn away, and both lean heavily on promotional pricing to acquire new accounts. But they diverge sharply once you look past the headline profit-split numbers: one is a UAE-registered firm still building out a consistent payout track record, while the other operates through a licensed Labuan money broker with a documented eight-figure payout history. For traders deciding between the two in 2026, the real question isn’t which firm advertises the bigger number — it’s which one has third-party evidence to back its claims, and which rule set actually matches how you trade.

The problem: The instant-funding segment of the prop industry has a trust problem, and both of these firms sit inside it. Traders researching Sure Leverage Funding run into a public rulebook that’s spread across multiple help-center articles with figures that don’t always agree — a $400,000 total cap in one place, a $200,000 active cap in another — and a Trustpilot history where the sharpest complaints only start appearing once traders approach a real payout. FXIFY traders hit a different friction point: the marketed 90% split isn’t the number you get by default, it’s a 20%-of-fee add-on layered on top of an 80% base, and a wave of 1-star reviews in 2026 specifically cites account breaches flagged after profitable trades. Add in the industry-wide average 5% challenge pass rate, and the anxiety is the same either way — you’re paying a one-time fee into a rules engine you don’t fully control, hoping the firm’s definition of a ‘violation’ matches yours when the payout request actually lands.

At a glance

Quick Comparison

Sure Leverage Funding FXIFY
Starting Price $5 per promo 2-Step $5K challenge activation (standard fees scale with account size up to $200K) $69 per one-time evaluation fee (One/Two/Three Phase, Instant, and Lightning paths)
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.3 / 5
Free Trial No (Free Challenge promo requires $1-5 activation fee, not a true free trial) No free trial; a 7-day Lightning Challenge path exists as a low-cost entry
Best For Traders who want EA/bot and HFT-style evaluations with an uncapped 100% top-tier profit split Broker-backed traders who want EAs, martingale and grid strategies with a $4M scaling ceiling
Ease of Use 4.2 / 10 4.4 / 10
Support Rating 3.8 / 10 4.1 / 10
Mobile App Via third-party MT5/Match-Trader mobile apps (no dedicated SLF app) Via third-party MT4/MT5/DXtrade mobile apps (no dedicated FXIFY app)
Start Sure Leverage Funding Challenge → Start an FXIFY Evaluation →

Pros & Cons

Sure Leverage Funding
Pros
  • Profit split scales up to 100% for top performers, the highest ceiling of any firm in this comparison
  • Dedicated EA Challenge account permits bots and algorithmic strategies during the evaluation phase
  • Promotional Free Challenge converts a $1-5 activation fee into a full $5,000 2-Step account
  • 24-hour payout processing promise, with a 10% profit-split bonus if the firm misses that window
Cons
  • Public rules conflict between a $400,000 total funding cap and a $200,000 active per-account cap, per TheTrustedProp’s audit
  • Soft-breach profit deductions are applied at payout review, which can zero out a payout if the deduction is large enough
  • Recent Trustpilot activity shows a growing share of 1-star reviews centered on payout delays and account-review disputes
FXIFY
Pros
  • Broker-backed via FXIFY Markets Ltd, a Labuan-licensed money broker, with execution through regulated broker FXPIG
  • Documented $30M+ paid across 11,000+ verified transactions via Payout Junction, including a single $119K+ payout
  • Seven distinct evaluation paths, the widest selection of account structures among mainstream instant-funding firms
  • EAs, martingale and grid trading are all explicitly allowed, with only latency arbitrage prohibited
Cons
  • The advertised 90% profit split is a paid add-on (20% of the evaluation fee), not the 80% default split
  • 1-star Trustpilot reviews were climbing as of May 2026 (675, up from 648 a month earlier), concentrated on account breaches and withdrawals
  • Recent rule changes moved the 2-Step account from static to trailing drawdown and added a consistency rule

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Feature Sure Leverage Funding FXIFY Winner
Max Profit Split Up to 100% (top-tier performers) Up to 90% (paid add-on) Sure Leverage Funding
Max Funded Allocation $400,000 total across accounts $4,000,000 via scaling plan FXIFY
Trustpilot Rating 4.1/5 (~1,700 reviews) 4.3/5 (6,146 reviews) FXIFY
EA / Algo Trading Allowed on EA Challenge (evaluation phase only) Allowed on all account types, including martingale and grid FXIFY
Payout Speed 24-hour promise, +10% split bonus if missed On-demand after first funded trade (One/Three Phase); bi-weekly (Instant) Tie
Integrations MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker; payouts via Rise and USDT (TRC20) MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradingView; payouts via Rise, bank wire and cryptocurrency

Final Verdict

🏆
Winner: FXIFY
On raw numbers, Sure Leverage Funding’s 100% top-tier profit split and near-free promotional entry point look more aggressive than anything FXIFY offers. But profit-split ceilings only matter if you can reliably reach a clean payout, and that’s where the comparison tips decisively toward FXIFY. A Labuan-licensed broker parent, execution through the regulated FXPIG, and an independently documented $30M+ in verified payouts give FXIFY a paper trail that Sure Leverage Funding — a firm still working out inconsistencies in its own published funding caps — simply hasn’t built yet in its roughly two years of operation. That said, FXIFY isn’t a clean win either: the 90% split behind a paywall, a rising 1-star review count through mid-2026, and a mid-year shift to trailing drawdown on its 2-Step account are real friction points traders should weigh before buying in. Our take: if your priority is a firm with a longer, better-documented payout history and you don’t mind paying extra for the top split, FXIFY is the safer default in 2026. If you specifically need a firm that tolerates HFT-style strategies from day one at the lowest possible entry cost, and you’re comfortable with a newer firm’s evolving rulebook, Sure Leverage Funding’s EA Challenge remains one of the more permissive options on the market — just budget time to read every help-center rule page before you fund a large account.
Choose Sure Leverage Funding if:you specifically want an EA/HFT-tolerant evaluation with the lowest possible entry cost and can tolerate a newer, less-verified payout track record
Choose FXIFY if:you want a broker-backed firm with a longer documented payout history and are willing to pay extra for the top 90% profit split

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sure Leverage Funding legit in 2026?

Sure Leverage Funding is an operating prop firm registered as ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE, founded in November 2023. It holds a 4-star Trustpilot rating from roughly 1,700+ reviews and has processed real payouts, but recent reviews show a rising share of complaints around payout timing and account-review disputes, so smaller test withdrawals are recommended before scaling up.

Is FXIFY legit and regulated?

Yes. FXIFY operates under FXIFY Markets Ltd, a money broker licensed in Labuan, Malaysia (License MB/22/0097), and executes trades through the regulated broker FXPIG. Independent tracking via Payout Junction confirms more than $30 million paid across over 11,000 verified transactions, which is a stronger third-party trust signal than most instant-funding competitors can show.

Which firm allows HFT and EA trading, Sure Leverage Funding or FXIFY?

Both allow automated strategies, but with different scope. Sure Leverage Funding restricts EA and algorithmic trading to its dedicated EA Challenge account during the evaluation phase only. FXIFY is more permissive across the board, explicitly allowing EAs, martingale and grid trading on all of its evaluation and instant-funding account types, with only latency arbitrage prohibited.

Why is FXIFY’s 90% profit split not the default rate?

FXIFY’s baseline profit split on most programs is 80%, and the widely advertised 90% figure is delivered through a paid add-on that costs an extra 20% of your evaluation fee at checkout. Traders comparing headline profit-split percentages across prop firms should always check whether the top rate is the default or an optional upsell, since it materially changes the true cost of funding.

Which firm has the higher maximum funded account size?

FXIFY offers a larger ceiling, with a scaling plan advertised to grow accounts up to $4,000,000 based on a 10% quarterly return with at least two profitable months out of three. Sure Leverage Funding caps total funding at $400,000 across all accounts held by a single trader, with individual challenge sizes ranging from $5,000 to $200,000.

Last verified: 2026-08-12 · software_a_review_count reflects the most recent Trustpilot snapshot found (page-count trend data through late May 2026, ~1,679 reviews, extrapolated to ‘1,700+’ as of this August 2026 update; no single live-count screenshot was available at time of writing). software_a_price_from reflects the promotional $1-5 ‘Free Challenge’ activation fee advertised on SLF’s own course page; standard non-promotional challenge fees for larger account sizes were not independently itemized and may be higher. software_b_review_count (6,146) is sourced from BestPropFirmGuide’s independently-tracked Trustpilot snapshot dated within this reporting period; other sources cited lower historical counts (2,576-4,000), reflecting FXIFY’s fast review-volume growth. This page discloses that some outbound links may be affiliate links; Verdixio’s rankings are not for sale and reflect the data available at time of publication.

Leave a Comment