Sure Leverage Funding and Aqua Funded both operate out of the UAE, both launched in 2023, and both compete aggressively on entry price and headline profit split — on the surface, they look like close substitutes. The difference that actually matters emerged only in 2026: Trustpilot flagged AquaFunded for a breach of its guidelines tied to detected fake-review activity and removed the firm’s public rating and review count, stripping away the single most-used independent trust signal in the prop firm space. Sure Leverage Funding, by contrast, maintains an active, unflagged Trustpilot profile with over 1,000 reviews a trader can read directly today. Both firms serve a similar audience — cost-sensitive traders in emerging markets who want a lower barrier to entry than legacy names like FTMO — but the trust picture between them has diverged sharply this year.
The problem: This is exactly the situation where a headline profit split number becomes actively misleading. AquaFunded markets splits as high as 100%, but independent reviewers have found the figure is genuinely inconsistent across the firm’s own materials — one page cites an 85% base split, another cites 90%, promotional copy claims 100% with an upgrade — and none of that ambiguity is resolvable without the Trustpilot review layer that would normally surface a pattern of complaints about which number traders actually receive. Multiple reviewers before the flag reported disputes over news-trading rule enforcement and a 2% floating loss limit on instant accounts that wasn’t clearly disclosed at checkout, and a firm that won’t name its broker or liquidity provider makes those disputes harder to independently verify. SLF has its own friction points — a consistency rule some traders find punitive — but every one of those complaints is checkable against a live, unflagged review base. When a firm’s core trust signal disappears entirely, the burden of proof shifts: traders considering AquaFunded in its current state should treat the $99 entry price as a real financial risk, not just a discount.
Quick Comparison
| Sure Leverage Funding | Aqua Funded | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $25 per challenge | $99 per $10,000 account |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 |
| Free Trial | No | No |
| Best For | Traders who want an independently checkable Trustpilot history before funding a challenge | Traders prioritizing a low $99 entry price and an aggressive headline profit split over third-party trust verification |
| Ease of Use | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Support Rating | 8 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Mobile App | No | No |
| Verify SLF’s Trustpilot Record → | See Aqua Funded’s Entry Pricing → |
Pros & Cons
- Active, unflagged Trustpilot profile with over 1,000 reviews traders can read directly
- Transparent 24-hour payout guarantee backed by an automatic 10% penalty bonus
- Dedicated EA/HFT challenge track with 1:100 evaluation leverage
- Free account reset included during the funded phase
- Consistency rule as strict as 20-25% on some programs can delay payouts after one large winning day
- Standard split capped at 80% until scaling milestones are met
- No published third-party audit of total payouts distributed
- Entry price as low as $99 for a $10,000 account, among the cheaper instant-adjacent options in its segment
- Dual scaling system that grows both account size and a career-tier “Aqua Elite” status simultaneously
- Advertises profit splits reaching 90-100% depending on plan and paid add-ons
- Multiple challenge models (1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, and Instant Funding) covering different risk appetites
- Trustpilot has removed or hidden AquaFunded’s public rating after flagging a breach of guidelines tied to fake reviews, per multiple independent trackers in 2026
- Profit split figures are inconsistent across the firm’s own published materials, ranging from 85% to 90% to 100% depending on the page
- AquaFunded does not clearly name a broker or liquidity provider, an unusual transparency gap for a firm handling simulated capital at this scale
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
| Feature | Sure Leverage Funding | Aqua Funded | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot Status | Active, unflagged, 1,000+ reviews | Removed/hidden after guideline breach flag | Sure Leverage Funding |
| Entry Price | $25 (3-Step $5K) | $99 (per $10,000 account) | Sure Leverage Funding |
| Max Profit Split (advertised) | 80% standard, up to 100% via scaling | Up to 90% standard, 100% via paid upgrade (inconsistent across own materials) | Tie |
| Max Funded Allocation | $400,000 | $1,000,000 (Elite tier marketed up to $4,000,000) | Aqua Funded |
| Broker/Liquidity Transparency | ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC named entity, UAE-registered | No named broker or liquidity provider disclosed | Sure Leverage Funding |
| Integrations | Riseworks.io, USDT (TRC20) payout rails; Discord community support | Multiple payout methods referenced in marketing materials; specific platform list not independently confirmed | — |
Final Verdict
Winner: Sure Leverage Funding
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Aqua Funded’s Trustpilot rating removed?
According to independent trackers including theindustryspread.com, Trustpilot detected and removed a number of fake reviews from AquaFunded’s profile in 2026 and posted an active breach-of-guidelines warning. As a result, the firm’s star rating and total review count are not currently visible on Trustpilot, removing the main independent signal traders would otherwise use to verify its payout reliability.
Is Aqua Funded still operating and processing payouts?
Based on available evidence, AquaFunded remains an operating firm that has processed real challenge purchases and payouts since 2023, so it is not accurately described as having disappeared with client funds. However, with its Trustpilot rating currently hidden, there is no reliable independent way to verify current payout consistency, so traders should proceed cautiously and confirm recent community feedback through other channels before committing significant funds.
What is Sure Leverage Funding’s actual Trustpilot standing?
Sure Leverage Funding’s Trustpilot profile is active and unflagged, showing a rating in the roughly 4.0-4.2 range from over 1,000 reviews as of mid-2026, with a visible pattern of both strong positive feedback on payout speed and a smaller cluster of complaints about its consistency rule. This gives traders a genuine, checkable data set rather than a firm’s self-reported claims.
Why is Aqua Funded’s profit split figure inconsistent?
Independent reviewers comparing AquaFunded’s own published pages have found the profit split cited differently across the firm’s materials — 85% on one page, 90% on another, and 100% in promotional marketing tied to a paid upgrade. This kind of inconsistency typically signals unclear internal documentation rather than deliberate misrepresentation, but it means traders should confirm the exact split in writing before purchasing a challenge.
Should I avoid all prop firms with a flagged Trustpilot profile?
Not automatically, but a flagged or removed rating is a legitimate red flag that should raise your due-diligence bar significantly. At minimum, traders should seek recent independent payout evidence from other sources (Reddit, Discord, prop firm forums) before committing meaningful capital to a firm currently missing its primary third-party trust signal.